UAP-I

THE KNOWLEDGE CENTRE

Everything we've worked out, with the sources.

Research on unidentified anomalous phenomena written for an Indian reader. Every claim carries a citation you can open and check. Where the evidence is contested, we say so rather than pick the more exciting side.

  • PRIMARY SOURCES
  • INDIAN CONTEXT
  • NO SPECULATION UNMARKED
  • UPDATED 2026

MOST RECENT

Latest from the archive

Newest first, updating itself as posts go live. The curated sections below are grouped by subject so you can go straight to what you need.

The Skies India Won’t Look At

UAP for India 27 July 2026 — Analysis — Diagnostic Security Studies International Relations Strategic Autonomy Political Theory The Skies India Won’t Look At India has a documented...

Four AARO reports in, the Pentagon’s UAP numbers keep growing — and the anomalies keep shrinking

UAP for India 27 July 2026 — Analysis — Explainer Political Theory Security Studies International Relations Four AARO reports in, the Pentagon’s UAP numbers keep growing — and...

NASA’s UAP Report Didn’t Find Aliens. It Found a Data Problem.

UAP for India 27 July 2026 — Analysis — Explainer Science Policy Space Policy Security Studies International Relations NASA’s UAP Report Didn’t Find Aliens. It Found a Data...

The Government Isn’t Using UFO Distraction. It’s Worse Than That.

UAP For India ✦ May 9, 2026 — Analysis — Weekly Political Theory Current Affairs Security Studies International Relations The Government Isn’t Using UFOs to Distract You. It’s Worse Than That. Why the...

UFO Ridicule as a Hegemonic Tool

UAP For India ✦ May 9, 2026 — Analysis — Weekly Political Theory Security Studies International Relations UFO Ridicule as a Hegemonic Tool How the scientific establishment polices the UAP question...

Pentagon’s UAP/UFO Report 2023 Explained

AARO 2023 Annual UAP Report Explained On October 17, 2023, the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) fulfilled its annual obligation by releasing the much-anticipated UAP (Unidentified Aerial...

START HERE

New to this

Two explainers that assume nothing. Read these first if the subject is unfamiliar.

ALL BEGINNER POSTS

What Do We Know About UAP Activity On Earth?

What Do We Know About UAP Activity On Earth? Unveiling the enigma of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs) reveals a captivating mystery. These modern-day UFOs challenge our understanding of the...

Defining UAPs And Their Capabilities

Defining UAPs And Their Capabilities In the realm of the unknown, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs) take center stage. This term, often misunderstood, is simply a modern twist on UFOs—renamed by...

What Has The US Congress Done So Far On UAP/UFOs?

What Has The US Congress Done So Far On UAP/UFOs? From initial skepticism to growing acknowledgment, the US Congress has played a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of UAP research and...

INDIA SERIES

India

The reason this site exists. What India has on record, and what it still has no framework to do about it.

ALL INDIA POSTS
No posts found.

US POLICY

Washington

The disclosure story everyone follows, told from the legislative record rather than the rumour mill.

No posts found.

ANALYSIS

Theory

Why states behave the way they do about this, and what the phenomenon does to strategy.

No posts found.

HOW WE WRITE

The rules we hold ourselves to.

This subject is unusually easy to get wrong, and unusually costly to get wrong in public. Most UAP writing fails in one of two directions: it either repeats claims without checking them, or it dismisses the whole field without engaging the evidence. Both are lazy. These are the standards that keep us out of each ditch.

MORE ABOUT UAP-I →
01

Every claim carries a source

If a statement of fact appears here, there is a link next to it you can open. Where a source could not be verified, the claim was cut rather than softened. Several figures that circulate widely in UAP writing did not survive that test and are absent from these articles deliberately.

02

Primary documents first

AARO and ODNI reports, congressional records, hearing transcripts and published testimony, read directly rather than through secondary retelling. Where we rely on press reporting for a causal claim, we say so in the text instead of presenting it as established.

03

Contested evidence stays contested

Some well-known cases have official resolutions that independent researchers dispute. We present both and let the disagreement stand. Picking the more dramatic reading would make for better copy and worse research.

04

Written for India

Plenty of outlets cover the American disclosure story. Almost nobody asks what it means for Indian airspace, Indian doctrine or Indian strategic autonomy. That gap is the whole reason this archive exists.

05

Corrections are permanent

When something here turns out to be wrong, it gets fixed and the correction stays visible. An archive that quietly edits its own history is not a record, and this is meant to be a record.

CONTRIBUTE TO THE RECORD

The most useful thing you can send us is a sighting nobody has logged.

REPORT YOUR SIGHTING →

MAKE A SUBMISSION

Send us something worth looking at.

Footage, photographs, radar plots, RTI responses, documents, or a sighting you have never reported anywhere. Indian material especially — that is the gap this archive exists to close, and almost none of it reaches the international databases.

Read the standards below before you send. They exist because a submission that meets them can actually be assessed, and one that does not usually cannot.

01

Send the original file

Straight off the camera or phone, uncropped and unedited. A screenshot of a video, or a re-upload from social media, strips the metadata that makes analysis possible. If you have already compressed it, send that too, but send the original as well.

02

Date, time, place, direction

Approximate is fine, but say so. Where you were standing, which way you were facing, and roughly how high above the horizon. Without these, almost nothing can be checked against flight paths, satellite passes or astronomical data.

03

Describe it plainly

What you saw, how long it lasted, whether it made noise, what else was in the sky. Write it the way you would tell a friend. Do not reach for a conclusion — that is our job, and a plain description is far more useful than an interpretation.

04

Tell us what you ruled out

Did you consider aircraft, drones, Starlink trains, balloons, Venus, lens flare? Saying what you already dismissed and why makes a report considerably stronger, not weaker. Most submissions resolve to something ordinary and that is a useful result.

05

Other witnesses

Anyone else present, and whether they saw the same thing. Independent accounts of the same event are the single most valuable thing a submission can carry. Their contact details only with their permission.

06

What we do with it

Nothing is published without your explicit permission, and you can ask to stay anonymous. We read everything but cannot reply to all of it. If we cannot resolve something we will say so rather than pad it into a story.

A live sighting you want on the record should go through the sighting report form instead — it captures the fields we need in a structured way. Use the form below for documents, media, corrections, or anything that does not fit a report.

THE FORM

Submit to UAP-I

Attachments welcome — images, video, audio, PDFs. Large files are better shared as a link.

HOW WE WRITE

The rules we hold ourselves to.

This subject is unusually easy to get wrong, and unusually costly to get wrong in public. Most UAP writing fails in one of two directions: it either repeats claims without checking them, or it dismisses the whole field without engaging the evidence. Both are lazy. These are the standards that keep us out of each ditch.

MORE ABOUT UAP-I →
01

Every claim carries a source

If a statement of fact appears here, there is a link next to it you can open. Where a source could not be verified, the claim was cut rather than softened. Several figures that circulate widely in UAP writing did not survive that test and are absent from these articles deliberately.

02

Primary documents first

AARO and ODNI reports, congressional records, hearing transcripts and published testimony, read directly rather than through secondary retelling. Where we rely on press reporting for a causal claim, we say so in the text instead of presenting it as established.

03

Contested evidence stays contested

Some well-known cases have official resolutions that independent researchers dispute. We present both and let the disagreement stand. Picking the more dramatic reading would make for better copy and worse research.

04

Written for India

Plenty of outlets cover the American disclosure story. Almost nobody asks what it means for Indian airspace, Indian doctrine or Indian strategic autonomy. That gap is the whole reason this archive exists.

05

Corrections are permanent

When something here turns out to be wrong, it gets fixed and the correction stays visible. An archive that quietly edits its own history is not a record, and this is meant to be a record.

CONTRIBUTE TO THE RECORD

The most useful thing you can send us is a sighting nobody has logged.

REPORT YOUR SIGHTING →

MAKE A SUBMISSION

Send us something worth looking at.

Footage, photographs, radar plots, RTI responses, documents, or a sighting you have never reported anywhere. Indian material especially — that is the gap this archive exists to close, and almost none of it reaches the international databases.

Read the standards below before you send. They exist because a submission that meets them can actually be assessed, and one that does not usually cannot.

01

Send the original file

Straight off the camera or phone, uncropped and unedited. A screenshot of a video, or a re-upload from social media, strips the metadata that makes analysis possible. If you have already compressed it, send that too, but send the original as well.

02

Date, time, place, direction

Approximate is fine, but say so. Where you were standing, which way you were facing, and roughly how high above the horizon. Without these, almost nothing can be checked against flight paths, satellite passes or astronomical data.

03

Describe it plainly

What you saw, how long it lasted, whether it made noise, what else was in the sky. Write it the way you would tell a friend. Do not reach for a conclusion — that is our job, and a plain description is far more useful than an interpretation.

04

Tell us what you ruled out

Did you consider aircraft, drones, Starlink trains, balloons, Venus, lens flare? Saying what you already dismissed and why makes a report considerably stronger, not weaker. Most submissions resolve to something ordinary and that is a useful result.

05

Other witnesses

Anyone else present, and whether they saw the same thing. Independent accounts of the same event are the single most valuable thing a submission can carry. Their contact details only with their permission.

06

What we do with it

Nothing is published without your explicit permission, and you can ask to stay anonymous. We read everything but cannot reply to all of it. If we cannot resolve something we will say so rather than pad it into a story.

A live sighting you want on the record should go through the sighting report form instead — it captures the fields we need in a structured way. Use the form below for documents, media, corrections, or anything that does not fit a report.

THE FORM

Submit to UAP-I

Send a link to your files rather than attaching them — Google Drive, WeTransfer, Dropbox, anything that keeps the original intact. Links avoid upload limits entirely, and mean nothing gets recompressed on the way to us.

If you would rather not use a form, email uapforindia@gmail.com directly and attach whatever you have.

UAP Content submission form